Blog

How long does it take to raise a seed round? Longer than a sale, because investors don't buy, they date

Sunny Ray · · 5 min read

Fundraising

A seed round usually takes two to three months from first meeting to money in the bank, and longer if you start without warm relationships. That's slower than most B2B sales cycles, and it should be. A customer buys a product to solve a problem now. An investor commits to a relationship for the next decade. Customers shop. Investors date.

Founders who can close a customer in a week tend to panic in a raise, because they expect shopping speed from a process that runs at dating speed.

Sales speed vs investor speed

On March 31 I had our weekly call with a founder whose events business closes deals fast. A company sees what she does, needs it, buys it. That's her normal.

The raise felt nothing like that. She'd had eight or nine investor conversations through our podcast outreach, good conversations, and still felt anxious. Nothing had the snap of a sale. On the call it got put the way I'd put it: investment is a dating style process. Slow motion compared to selling.

That's not a sign the raise is failing. It's what a raise is.

Elad Gil has an essay with a title that says it plainly: fundraising will take you about three months. His point is that outside a few hot companies, a round takes two to three months from start to close. If you plan for two weeks, every week after that feels like failure. If you plan for three months, you can stay calm and keep building.

8 to 9 conversations, wrong mandates

When we went through her conversations, the anxiety had a second source. Some of those first dates were with people who were never her type.

One investor only did blockchain. Another only invested in Nordic founders. Neither had a reason to back an events business, however good. Those conversations weren't failures of the pitch. They were failures of targeting, and they cost her time and confidence.

The conclusion on our call: "We need to do targeting much better." Exactly right.

The same week I'd saved a post from someone who sent the same script to two lists of the same size and got wildly different results. The difference was upstream of the copy. That's exactly what she was feeling. The pitch wasn't the problem. The list was.

Pre-screen before the invite

The fix is to screen mandate before you ever send an invite. Before an investor gets a message, check three things:

If any of those is a hard no, they don't get invited, however impressive the name. A shorter list of investors who could actually say yes beats a long list of people who were never going to.

In dating terms: don't spend your Friday nights with people who've told you up front they're only interested in someone else.

You can even screen in the invite itself. One line does it: "I'm reaching out because you back [sector] founders at [stage] in [region]." If that sentence isn't true for the investor, don't send the email. If it is, you've told them in one line why the date is worth their time.

The SPV that turns angel checks into one

The other thing slowing her down was mechanics. Angel checks come in small, and every small check is another name on the cap table. Some founders stall rather than deal with that.

On the call she confirmed she'd lined up an SPV provider to roll multiple angel checks into a single vehicle, expected in about two weeks. That's a small thing that removes a big source of friction. Angels can commit without each one becoming a line item, and the founder can accept the small checks that add up.

Same day: the panel's favourite

Here's the part that made the anxiety look silly. That evening she pitched at Spark Tank, our weekly pitch show. Three of the investors on the panel named her company their top pick.

And by then she had 1.3 million of a 1.5 million raise committed.

The panel's reasons were worth hearing. One investor said he expected a swing back from digital to analog, toward real rooms and real meetings, which is exactly her business. Another said that in a time of tech, the human aspect becomes the real differentiator. Neither of those is a metric. Both are a thesis, and when your company fits an investor's thesis, the dating speeds up on its own.

So on the same day she said the raise felt slow, she was most of the way to closed and the room's favourite. The raise wasn't failing. It was moving at investor speed, which feels slow from the inside and looks fast from the outside.

What to do while you wait

Investors don't buy on the first meeting. Give them the right first meetings and enough time to fall for it. If you want those meetings to start as conversations, see how founders use a show to meet investors.

Frequently asked questions

How long does a seed round take?

Usually two to three months from start to close, longer without warm relationships. Elad Gil's essay on the subject is titled Fundraising Will Take You ~3 Months.

Why is fundraising slower than sales?

A customer buys a product to solve a problem now; an investor commits to a relationship for years. Investors date before they commit.

How do I pre-screen investors before a meeting?

Check sector, geography, and stage and check size before inviting anyone. One founder lost time on an investor who only did blockchain and another who only backed Nordic founders.

What is an SPV and when should I use one?

A single vehicle that pools several angel checks into one line on your cap table. Set one up early if you expect many small checks.

Related posts