In small markets the best lead database is the government's: company registry data for B2B lead generation

Sunny Ray · Jun 8, 2026 · 6 min read

In small markets, the best lead database is the government's, and it's usually free or close to it.

If you sell B2B in a country where the global databases are thin, start your list from the national company registry. A registry tells you which companies exist, whether they're active, what they turn over and whether they're sliding toward bankruptcy, often faster and more accurately than any international data vendor. Use it to pick the companies. Then use enrichment, or plain research, to find the right person at each one. Company truth from the registry, contact data from somewhere else.

The trick I heard on a partnership call

On June 3 I was on a partnership call with the founder of a company from Latvia that helps startups get cloud credits and handles migrations. I talk to 20 or 30 founders a day, and I always ask the same question at some point: how do you go to market?

His answer started the way most do. LinkedIn outreach with an automation tool. Cold email. A lot of conferences. Then he explained where the email list comes from, and it wasn't where I expected.

They scrape contacts from local company registries. In Latvia that means the national registry: they look up companies, sort them by turnover and similar fields, then get the contacts. They use Clay only for countries or regions where they can't get into a local registry. His reason, in his words:

local one is the actual one

Why global databases are thin in small markets

The big prospecting databases are strongest where the most buyers are: the US first, then the larger English-speaking markets. In a country of a couple of million people, coverage drops off. Companies are missing, headcount numbers are stale, someone who left two years ago still shows as the CEO.

That's a data supply problem, not a vendor problem. The international databases build their records from the public web and from their users. Small-market companies leave a lighter trail on both, so the record stays thin. The registry has no such gap, because a company has to file with it to exist.

What a registry tells you that a prospecting database can't

The detail that stuck with me was speed. When something happens to a company, the registry shows it right away:

if there is something happens to the company local register will display it immediately

He walked through what that gives you: whether the company is active, whether it had cash flow over the past year, and whether it's heading toward bankruptcy without being there yet. That last one matters more than it sounds. A company on its way down won't buy anything. Emailing it just burns your sending credits and hurts your bounce rate when the mailboxes start shutting off.

So the registry gives you two filters at once. A positive one: companies with the turnover that fits your offer. And a negative one: companies you should never email, no matter how well they match your ICP on paper.

Target by health, not just by firmographics

Most ICPs are written in firmographics: industry, size, location, title. A registry lets you add a layer most teams don't have, which is financial health.

Think about what that does for a campaign. A company that grew its turnover last year has budget and is probably hiring, buying tools, changing vendors. A company whose numbers fell is cutting. Same industry, same size, same title, completely different reply rate. If you can sort the list by health before you send, you spend your volume on the companies that can say yes.

This week I saved a post on X arguing that you should own your total addressable market as a real spreadsheet, not a number on a slide. A registry export is exactly that, for a small market: every company that exists, with fields you can sort, not an estimate.

Registry for the company, enrichment for the person

The registry is not a complete lead list. It tells you about the company. It doesn't reliably tell you who handles cloud costs, or what their work email is. That's the second step.

His team's approach: registry first to pick and filter companies, then their sequencing tool for the email itself, with Clay only where the registry route isn't available. The general pattern works anywhere:

• Pull companies from the registry and filter by status, turnover and trend.
• Drop anything inactive or financially distressed before it touches a campaign.
• Find the decision maker at each surviving company through enrichment, the company website or LinkedIn research.
• Verify every email before it goes into a sequence.

One caution: registries vary country to country in what they publish and how you're allowed to use it, and outreach in Europe comes with its own rules. Check both before you build a campaign on the data.

Events as the second filter

The other half of his go-to-market was in-person. He named two conferences his team goes to every year: Slush in Helsinki, which he put at more than 10,000 people and runs around November, and EU-Startups Summit in Malta in May. His claim was that you don't come back from either without leads, or even deals.

The registry tells you who exists and who's healthy. The event tells you who's active and willing to talk. Put them together and your cold email to a founder can reference the room you'll both be in, which is a far better reason to reply than another feature list.

If you sell into a small market

Stop assuming your prospecting database is the source of truth. Find out what your country's company registry publishes, pull it, and compare it to what your current tool shows for the same companies. If the registry wins on accuracy, and in small markets it often will, rebuild your list from it.

If you want the list built and turned into guest invitations for the companies that can buy, see how guest lists get built.

Frequently asked questions